Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

(Download) "Case of the State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds. Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania" by United States Supreme Court * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Case of the State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds. Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Case of the State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds. Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania
  • Author : United States Supreme Court
  • Release Date : January 01, 1872
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 92 KB

Description

ERROR to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; the case being thus: The plaintiff in error, in this case, the Cleveland, Painesville, and Ashtabula Railroad Company, was incorporated by an act of the legislature of Ohio, passed in 1848, and authorized to construct a railroad from the city of Cleveland, in that State, to the line of the State of Pennsylvania. Under this act and its supplement, passed in 1850, the road was constructed. By an act of the legislature of Pennsylvania, passed in 1854, the company was authorized to construct a railroad from the city of Erie, in that State, to the State line of Ohio, so as to connect with this road from Cleveland, and also to purchase a railroad already constructed between those points. This grant of authority was subject to various conditions, which the company accepted, and under its provisions the road between the points designated was constructed, or the one already constructed was purchased, and connected with the road from Cleveland, so that the two roads together formed one continuous line between the cities of Cleveland and Erie. The whole road between those places was ninety-five and a half miles in length, of which twenty-five miles and a half were situated in the State of Pennsylvania, and the rest, seventy miles, were situated in the State of Ohio. The company, so far as it acted in Pennsylvania under the authority of the act of her legislature, has been held by her courts to be a separate corporation of that State, and as such subject to her laws for the taxation of incorporated companies.1 But there was only one board of directors who managed the affairs of both companies as one company, and had the entire control of the whole road between Cleveland and Erie.


PDF Books "Case of the State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds. Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania" Online ePub Kindle